Screener
NATO vs FBUF
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
Key differences
- NATO costs 0.13% less per year.
- NATO is significantly larger than FBUF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NATO is classified as equity, while FBUF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- NATO follows a index tracking strategy; FBUF uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | FBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $19M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.65% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 7.58% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -11.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and FBUF
Explore further