Screener
NATO vs FDEM
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FDEM costs 0.10% less per year.
- FDEM is significantly larger than NATO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | FDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $508M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 2.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +42.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 17.19% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -33.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and FDEM
Explore further