Screener
NATO vs FFLV
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap
Key differences
- NATO is significantly larger than FFLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NATO follows a index tracking strategy; FFLV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | FFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $17M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 11.50% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and FFLV
Explore further