Screener
NATO vs LSEQ
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Key differences
- NATO costs 1.93% less per year.
- NATO is significantly larger than LSEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NATO is classified as equity, while LSEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- NATO follows a index tracking strategy; LSEQ uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 2.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $15M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 14.93% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -8.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and LSEQ
Explore further