Screener
NATO vs TMAT
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Main Thematic Innovation ETF
Key differences
- NATO costs 0.47% less per year.
- NATO is classified as equity, while TMAT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- NATO follows a index tracking strategy; TMAT uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.82% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $211M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.02% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +41.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 24.16% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -58.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and TMAT
Explore further