Screener
NBCM vs ISMF
Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- NBCM costs 0.15% less per year.
- NBCM is significantly larger than ISMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NBCM follows a multi strategy strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
- NBCM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBCM | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $424M | $57M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.44% | 2.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | multi strategy | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.50% | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -12.85% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NBCM and ISMF
Explore further