Screener
NBGX vs HQGO
Neuberger Growth ETF vs Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- HQGO costs 0.10% less per year.
- HQGO is significantly larger than NBGX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NBGX is classified as alternative, while HQGO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NBGX follows a option income strategy; HQGO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBGX | HQGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $48M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.1% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.30% | 13.47% |
| Max drawdown | -21.55% | -20.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NBGX and HQGO
Explore further