Screener
NBIE vs EEMA
Neuberger International Core Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both NBIE and EEMA are equity ETFs. NBIE charges 0.29% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: NBIE follows a active selection strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.
- NBIE follows a active selection strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.
- NBIE covers global markets excluding the US; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- NBIE costs 0.20% less per year.
- EEMA is much larger than NBIE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBIE | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $240M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2026 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.37% |
| Max drawdown | -5.76% | -44.18% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.