Screener
NBJP vs GSID
Neuberger Japan Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
Key differences
Both NBJP and GSID are equity ETFs. NBJP charges 0.50% a year and GSID 0.20%. The main difference: NBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region; GSID covers global markets excluding the US.
- NBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region; GSID covers global markets excluding the US.
- GSID costs 0.30% less per year.
- GSID is much larger than NBJP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBJP | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $151M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.00% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -29.89% |
Similar to NBJP and GSID
Explore further