Screener
NBJP vs GSIE
Neuberger Japan Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
Key differences
Both NBJP and GSIE are equity ETFs. NBJP charges 0.50% a year and GSIE 0.25%. The main difference: NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; GSIE uses index enhanced.
- NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; GSIE uses index enhanced.
- NBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region; GSIE covers global markets.
- GSIE costs 0.25% less per year.
- GSIE is much larger than NBJP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSIE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBJP | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $151M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 2.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.00% | 14.33% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -34.63% |
Similar to NBJP and GSIE
Explore further