Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

NBSM vs IJH

Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

NBSM

Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$226M

IJH

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

Annual cost

0.05%

Fund size

$119.2B

Key differences

Both NBSM and IJH are equity ETFs. NBSM charges 0.65% a year and IJH 0.05%. The main difference: NBSM follows a active selection strategy; IJH uses index tracking.

  • NBSM follows a active selection strategy; IJH uses index tracking.
  • IJH costs 0.60% less per year.
  • IJH is much larger than NBSM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • IJH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

NBSMIJH
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.05%
Fund size (AUM)$226M$119.2B
Since20242000
Dividend yield0.38%1.19%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+8.5%+23.7%
CAGR 3YN/A+17.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.8%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.77
Volatility 1Y14.92%15.64%
Max drawdown-25.16%-42.18%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to NBSM and IJH