Screener
NBSM vs NBJP
Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF vs Neuberger Japan Equity ETF
Key differences
- NBJP costs 0.15% less per year.
- NBSM covers north america markets; NBJP covers asia pacific.
- NBSM follows a active selection strategy; NBJP uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBSM | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $228M | $131M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 2.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.6% | +36.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.07% | 19.80% |
| Max drawdown | -25.16% | -14.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NBSM and NBJP
Explore further