Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

NBSM vs SCHX

Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF

NBSM

Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF

Neuberger Berman

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$228M

SCHX

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF

Schwab ETFs

Annual cost

0.03%

Fund size

$68.2B

Key differences

  • SCHX costs 0.62% less per year.
  • SCHX is significantly larger than NBSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • NBSM follows a active selection strategy; SCHX uses index tracking.
  • SCHX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

NBSMSCHX
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.03%
Fund size (AUM)$228M$68.2B
Since20242009
Dividend yield0.38%1.06%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+10.6%+28.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+23.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+13.4%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.23
Volatility 1Y15.07%12.16%
Max drawdown-25.16%-34.33%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to NBSM and SCHX