Screener
NBTR vs GIGB
Neuberger Total Return Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
Both NBTR and GIGB are fixed income ETFs. NBTR charges 0.38% a year and GIGB 0.08%. The main difference: NBTR follows a active selection strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
- NBTR follows a active selection strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
- GIGB costs 0.30% less per year.
- GIGB is much larger than NBTR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GIGB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBTR | GIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $982M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 5.17% | 4.61% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.51% | 4.31% |
| Max drawdown | -2.58% | -22.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.