Screener
NCIQ vs BITO
Hashdex Nasdaq CME Crypto Index ETF vs ProShares Bitcoin ETF
Key differences
- NCIQ costs 0.70% less per year.
- BITO is significantly larger than NCIQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| NCIQ | BITO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $109M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 71.92% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | — |
| CAGR 1Y | -32.9% | -34.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +31.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 46.81% | 43.11% |
| Max drawdown | -52.90% | -77.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NCIQ and BITO
Explore further