Screener
NCIQ vs BITW
Hashdex Nasdaq CME Crypto Index ETF vs Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF
Key differences
- NCIQ costs 0.50% less per year.
- BITW is significantly larger than NCIQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BITW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NCIQ | BITW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $109M | $739M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | — |
| CAGR 1Y | -32.9% | -23.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +66.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 46.81% | 48.70% |
| Max drawdown | -52.90% | -96.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NCIQ and BITW
Explore further