Skip to content
Screener

NDAA vs AOR

Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

NDAA

Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$5M

AOR

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.6B

Key differences

NDAA is an alternative ETF, while AOR is a mixed asset ETF. NDAA charges 0.65% a year and AOR 0.15%.

  • NDAA is an alternative fund, while AOR is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • NDAA follows a tactical allocation strategy; AOR uses active selection.
  • AOR costs 0.50% less per year.
  • AOR is much larger than NDAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

NDAAAOR
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$5M$3.6B
Since20242008
Dividend yield2.44%2.47%
Asset classalternativemixed asset
Region
Strategytactical allocationactive selection
CAGR 1Y+22.4%+17.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+14.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.9%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.08
Volatility 1Y11.20%8.85%
Max drawdown-13.50%-22.95%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to NDAA and AOR