Screener
NDAA vs GAL
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
NDAA is an alternative ETF, while GAL is a mixed asset ETF. NDAA charges 0.65% a year and GAL 0.35%.
- NDAA is an alternative fund, while GAL is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GAL costs 0.30% less per year.
- GAL is much larger than NDAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NDAA | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $306M |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.44% | 3.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.4% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.20% | 9.16% |
| Max drawdown | -13.50% | -28.31% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.