Screener
NDAA vs GDMA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF vs Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Key differences
Both NDAA and GDMA are alternative ETFs. NDAA charges 0.65% a year and GDMA 0.75%. The main difference: NDAA follows a tactical allocation strategy; GDMA uses multi strategy.
- NDAA follows a tactical allocation strategy; GDMA uses multi strategy.
- NDAA costs 0.10% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than NDAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NDAA | GDMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $204M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.44% | 2.59% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.4% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.20% | 14.39% |
| Max drawdown | -13.50% | -16.66% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.