Screener
NEAR vs BYLD
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
Key differences
- BYLD costs 0.12% less per year.
- NEAR is significantly larger than BYLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NEAR follows a active selection strategy; BYLD uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| NEAR | BYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.3B | $387M |
| Since | 2013 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 5.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.7% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.9% | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.37% | 3.86% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -14.75% |
Similar to NEAR and BYLD
Explore further