Screener
NEAR vs CGSM
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- NEAR is significantly larger than CGSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NEAR follows a active selection strategy; CGSM uses index tracking.
- NEAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NEAR | CGSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.3B | $1.1B |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.37% | 1.33% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -1.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NEAR and CGSM
Explore further