Screener
NEAR vs CSHP
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- NEAR is significantly larger than CSHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NEAR covers north america markets; CSHP covers global.
- NEAR follows a active selection strategy; CSHP uses index tracking.
- NEAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NEAR | CSHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.3B | $190M |
| Since | 2013 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 5.10% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.37% | 0.34% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -0.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NEAR and CSHP
Explore further