Screener
NEAR vs IMTB
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IMTB costs 0.19% less per year.
- NEAR is significantly larger than IMTB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NEAR follows a active selection strategy; IMTB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, NEAR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NEAR | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.3B | $280M |
| Since | 2013 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 4.46% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.37% | 4.06% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -18.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NEAR and IMTB
Explore further