Screener
NEAR vs SCCR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs Schwab Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCCR costs 0.09% less per year.
- NEAR is significantly larger than SCCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NEAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NEAR | SCCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.3B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 4.47% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.37% | 3.84% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -2.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NEAR and SCCR
Explore further