Screener
NEAR vs SPIB
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SPIB costs 0.21% less per year.
- NEAR follows a active selection strategy; SPIB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| NEAR | SPIB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.3B | $11.0B |
| Since | 2013 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 4.43% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.7% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.9% | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.37% | 2.85% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -14.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NEAR and SPIB
Explore further