Screener
NFEB vs CGSD
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSD costs 0.54% less per year.
- CGSD is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while CGSD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; CGSD uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | CGSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 1.47% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -1.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and CGSD
Explore further