Screener
NFEB vs GRPM
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
Key differences
- GRPM costs 0.44% less per year.
- GRPM is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while GRPM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; GRPM uses index tracking.
- GRPM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $482M |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.98% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 16.36% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -43.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and GRPM
Explore further