Screener
NLR vs FDRS
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- NLR is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NLR is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- NLR follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- NLR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NLR | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $77M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.35% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NLR and FDRS
Explore further