Screener
NLR vs VTV
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF vs Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTV costs 0.49% less per year.
- VTV is significantly larger than NLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, NLR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NLR | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $237.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.1% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.9% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.5% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.97% | 10.21% |
| Max drawdown | -34.35% | -36.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NLR and VTV
Explore further