Screener
NLSI vs IWMI
Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF vs NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
Key differences
- IWMI costs 2.21% less per year.
- IWMI is significantly larger than NLSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NLSI follows a long short strategy; IWMI uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| NLSI | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.89% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $806M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 13.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +38.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.84% |
| Max drawdown | -13.82% | -23.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NLSI and IWMI
Explore further