Screener
NTSE vs DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund
Key differences
- NTSE costs 0.31% less per year.
- DEM is significantly larger than NTSE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NTSE follows a active selection strategy; DEM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, NTSE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NTSE | DEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $3.7B |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.88% | 4.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.6% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.25% | 13.28% |
| Max drawdown | -42.84% | -37.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NTSE and DEM
Explore further