Screener
NUMG vs MID
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
Key differences
- NUMG costs 0.14% less per year.
- NUMG is significantly larger than MID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NUMG follows a index tracking strategy; MID uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MID has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NUMG | MID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.31% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $354M | $93M |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.01% | 0.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.4% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.0% | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.94% | 16.67% |
| Max drawdown | -38.85% | -40.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NUMG and MID
Explore further