Screener
NUMG vs NUSA
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- NUSA costs 0.17% less per year.
- NUMG is significantly larger than NUSA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NUMG is classified as equity, while NUSA is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, NUMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NUMG | NUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.31% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $354M | $34M |
| Since | 2016 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.01% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.4% | +3.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.0% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.94% | 1.85% |
| Max drawdown | -38.85% | -9.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NUMG and NUSA
Explore further