Screener
NUMV vs NUSA
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF vs Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- NUSA costs 0.17% less per year.
- NUMV is significantly larger than NUSA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NUMV is classified as equity, while NUSA is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, NUMV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NUMV | NUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.31% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $431M | $34M |
| Since | 2016 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +3.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.2% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.62% | 1.85% |
| Max drawdown | -43.46% | -9.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NUMV and NUSA
Explore further