Screener
NUSA vs NUMG
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF vs Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- NUSA costs 0.17% less per year.
- NUMG is significantly larger than NUSA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NUSA is classified as fixed income, while NUMG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, NUMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NUSA | NUMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.14% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $354M |
| Since | 2017 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.82% | 0.01% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.8% | -1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.24 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.85% | 17.94% |
| Max drawdown | -9.44% | -38.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NUSA and NUMG
Explore further