Screener
NUSA vs PCRB
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF vs Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
Key differences
- NUSA costs 0.22% less per year.
- NUSA is significantly larger than PCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NUSA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NUSA | PCRB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.14% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $7M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.82% | 9.54% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.8% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.24 | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.85% | 3.79% |
| Max drawdown | -9.44% | -7.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NUSA and PCRB
Explore further