Screener
NUSB vs CGMU
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- NUSB costs 0.10% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than NUSB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NUSB follows a active selection strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| NUSB | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.17% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $157M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.34% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.37% | 2.29% |
| Max drawdown | -0.16% | -4.10% |
Similar to NUSB and CGMU
Explore further