Screener
NVD vs AMDL
Graniteshares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
Key differences
- AMDL costs 0.28% less per year.
- AMDL is significantly larger than NVD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NVD follows a inverse strategy; AMDL uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| NVD | AMDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.35% | 1.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $944M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -71.4% | +956.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 67.92% | 128.56% |
| Max drawdown | -99.26% | -88.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NVD and AMDL
Explore further