Screener
NYF vs CALI
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF vs iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF
Key differences
- NYF costs 0.11% less per year.
- NYF is significantly larger than CALI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NYF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NYF | CALI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $295M |
| Since | 2007 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 2.55% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +3.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.18 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.79% | 0.76% |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -0.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NYF and CALI
Explore further