Screener
NYF vs INMU
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF vs iShares Intermediate Muni Income Active ETF
Key differences
- NYF costs 0.21% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, INMU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- NYF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NYF | INMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $457M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 3.37% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.7% | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.18 | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.79% | 2.50% |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -10.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NYF and INMU
Explore further