Screener
NZAC vs PABU
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF vs iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF
Key differences
- PABU is significantly larger than NZAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PABU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- NZAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NZAC | PABU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $188M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2014 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.83% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.7% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.3% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.95% | 13.38% |
| Max drawdown | -33.72% | -20.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NZAC and PABU
Explore further