Screener
OALC vs FDG
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- OALC follows a index tracking strategy; FDG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OALC | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $220M | $387M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.7% | +37.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.0% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.05% | 17.85% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OALC and FDG
Explore further