Screener
OALC vs SMMD
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- SMMD costs 0.34% less per year.
- SMMD is significantly larger than OALC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, OALC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OALC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $220M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.7% | +39.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.0% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.05% | 17.31% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OALC and SMMD
Explore further