Screener
OASC vs CGUS
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.36% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OASC follows a index tracking strategy; CGUS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 12.48% |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -22.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and CGUS
Explore further