Screener
OASC vs LRGF
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- LRGF costs 0.61% less per year.
- LRGF is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OASC follows a index tracking strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
- LRGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -36.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and LRGF
Explore further