Screener
OASC vs PY
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs Principal Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.54% less per year.
- OASC follows a index tracking strategy; PY uses active selection.
- PY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | PY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $212M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 10.72% |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -45.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and PY
Explore further