Screener
OASC vs SLYV
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- SLYV costs 0.54% less per year.
- SLYV is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SLYV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | SLYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $4.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 1.84% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 18.44% |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -47.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and SLYV
Explore further