Screener
OASC vs VB
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VB costs 0.66% less per year.
- VB is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $177.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 16.45% |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -42.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and VB
Explore further