Screener
OEF vs INRO
iShares S&P 100 ETF vs iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- OEF costs 0.22% less per year.
- OEF is significantly larger than INRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OEF | INRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19.6B | $31M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 0.69% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.6% | +34.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.30 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.86% | 12.93% |
| Max drawdown | -31.44% | -20.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OEF and INRO
Explore further