Screener
OIH vs GPZ
VanEck Oil Services ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- OIH costs 0.05% less per year.
- OIH is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OIH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OIH | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $245M |
| Since | 2011 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.09% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +108.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.24% | — |
| Max drawdown | -89.61% | -31.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OIH and GPZ
Explore further